eesier vs Lusha
Lusha is the global go-to for B2B email + phone lookup — pay-per-credit. eesier is the agent that uses similar data and acts — no credits, no manual operation.
Lusha is an Israeli B2B contact enrichment platform (emails, phones, titles) with a pay-per-credit model, popular for extracting data from LinkedIn and websites. eesier is an autonomous AI SDR — built-in 60M+ company database, web research per lead, AI that writes and qualifies — at $297/month flat with no credits.
What's the difference between eesier and Lusha?
Lusha sells contact credits (you operate manually). eesier is an agent that researches + writes + sends + qualifies.
| Aspect | Lusha | eesier |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Contact enrichment | Autonomous AI SDR |
| Model | Pay-per-credit | Flat monthly price |
| Sends email | No | Yes |
| No | Yes | |
| Pricing | USD 29-69/user + credits | $297/month total |
Pay-per-credit vs flat pricing
Lusha charges license + credits per revealed contact. High-volume operations blow the budget. eesier is flat monthly with no per-contact charge.
For 1,000 contacts/month: Lusha can run USD 500-1,500 depending on tier. eesier: flat price, no usage caps.
How eesier replaces the Lusha workflow
No credit-by-credit lookups. You set ICP in eesier; it searches the database, researches contacts via web, and prospects — all in one agent.
Instead of: buy contacts in Lusha → export → import into sender → operate. With eesier: set ICP and the agent executes end-to-end.
Combining Lusha and eesier
Rarely worth it. Edge case: prospecting in markets where Lusha has unique coverage eesier doesn't.
For most use cases, eesier alone solves it.
Perguntas frequentes
Does Lusha have good Brazil coverage?
Can I use the Lusha extension inside eesier?
No credits?
Free trial?
简单直接
大多数公司隐藏定价。他们制造令人困惑的方案、对比表、虚假折扣和无人阅读的附加条款。eesier不这样做。没有套路，只有真诚。
一个方案。无需承诺。随时取消。
eesier starts at $297/month — less than the cost of a sales intern and a fraction of what a stack of separate prospecting tools would cost.